Philosophy and scientific realism
Read Online

Philosophy and scientific realism

  • 134 Want to read
  • ·
  • 16 Currently reading

Published by Routledge & K. Paul in London .
Written in English


  • Philosophy

Book details:

Edition Notes

Bibliographical footnotes.

The Physical Object
Pagination160 p.
Number of Pages160
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL26983971M
LC Control Number65099540

Download Philosophy and scientific realism


The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism is essential reading for students and researchers in philosophy of science. It will also be very useful for anyone interested in the nature and extent of scientific : Hardcover. Scientific realism is the optimistic view that modern science is on the right track: that the world really is the way our best scientific theories describe it. In his book, Stathis Psillos gives us a detailed and comprehensive study which restores the intuitive plausibility of scientific by: Book Description. Originally published in In an introductory chapter the author argues that philosophy ought to be more than the art of clarifying thought and that it should concern itself with outlining a scientifically plausible world view. Book Description. Scientific realism is a central, long-standing, and hotly debated topic in philosophy of science. Debates about scientific realism concern the very nature and extent of scientific .

Ambitious and tightly argued, A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism advances new positions on major topics in philosophy of science and offers a version of realism as original as it is compelling, making it essential reading for philosophers of science, epistemologists, and scholars in science by: His account of scientific realism is in my view somewhat idiosyncratic, since he takes scientific realism to involve two theses: one axiological and another doxastic (about belief). The axiological thesis says that theories aim at truth; the doxastic thesis says that acceptance of a theory involves belief in its truth. This book is two things, a survey of philosophical positions and a polemic in favor of one of them. The positions surveyed are the many varieties of subjectivism and realism; the polemic is in favor of the form of realism known as "scientific realism.".Cited by: The quintessential reading on the Philosophy of Science, a book to be read and re-read by those engaged in all modes of scientific inquiry, both in physical and social sciences. This is an excellent historical narrative, that argues and explains its way past each new development in the manner and social order of scientific thinking/5.

The scientific realism debate is at the heart of philosophy of science, with tight connections to issues concerning the nature of scientific models and theories, inter-theory relationships, explanation, and the relationship between science and metaphysics, to name a few. Semantic Challenges to Scientific Realism. Holger Andreas - - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1) - Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and ries: Standard Scientific Realism in . This book comes to the rescue of scientific realism, showing that reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. Philosophical realism holds that the aim of a particular discourse is to make true statements about its subject matter. Ilkka Niiniluoto surveys different kinds of realism in various areas of philosophy and then sets out his own critical realist philosophy of science. Author's summary: I discuss the lessons that scientific realism, understood as a thesis about the metaphysical, epistemological, and semantic interpretation of scientific theories, has to learn from the philosophy of scientific practice.